Traditional Wisdom on Cultivated Edible Plants: Ethnobotany of the Kui Ethnic Group in Sangkha District, Surin Province, Northeastern Thailand

Main Article Content

Piyaporn Saensouk
Surapon Saensouk
Phiphat Sonthongphithak
Auemporn Junsongduang
Khamfa Chanthavongsa
Tammanoon Jitpromma

Abstract

This study explores the ethnobotanical knowledge of cultivated edible plants among the Kui community in Sangkha District, Surin Province, Northeastern Thailand, emphasising their cultural, nutritional, and medicinal roles. A total of 77 species from 44 families were documented, with Fabaceae and Zingiberaceae being the most represented. Introduced species (62.34%) were more common than native species (37.66%), reflecting historical crop dissemination and cultural adoption, while native species continue to play important roles in cultural identity and ecosystem resilience. Herbs and trees were the predominant growth forms, supporting both immediate and long-term subsistence needs. Analyses of use value (UV), fidelity level (FL), and informant consensus factor (Fic) highlighted key species central to local livelihoods and healthcare, including Citrus hystrix DC., Morinda citrifolia L., Oryza sativa L., and Piper sarmentosum Roxb., demonstrating multifunctionality in both culinary and medicinal contexts. Leaves, rhizomes, and inflorescences were the most commonly used plant parts, suggesting deliberate selection for nutritional and pharmacological benefits. These cultivated edible plants not only sustain traditional food practices but also support livelihoods, income generation, and intergenerational knowledge transfer. The findings provide a basis for future phytochemical, nutritional, socio-cultural, and agroecological studies aimed at enhancing biodiversity conservation, food security, and sustainable use of ethnobotanical resources.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Traditional Wisdom on Cultivated Edible Plants: Ethnobotany of the Kui Ethnic Group in Sangkha District, Surin Province, Northeastern Thailand. (2025). Tropical Journal of Natural Product Research , 9(12), 6128 – 6143. https://doi.org/10.26538/tjnpr/v9i12.29

References

1.Gaoue OG, Coe MA, Bond M, Hart G, Seyler BC, McMillen H. Theories and major hypotheses in ethnobotany. Econ. Bot. 2017; 71:269-287. Doi: 10.1007/s12231-017-9389-8

2.Pandey A, Tripathi Y. Ethnobotany and its relevance in contemporary research. J. Medic. Plants Stud. 2017; 5:123-129.

3.Kennedy G, Wang Z, Maundu P, Hunter D. The role of traditional knowledge and food biodiversity to transform modern food systems. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2022; 130:32-41. Doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2022.09.011

4.Saensouk P, Saensouk S, Boonma T, Zhang Y, Lv L, Jitpromma T. Ethnobotanical heritage of edible plant species in Mueang District, Yasothon Province, Northeastern Thailand. Biology. 2025; 14:1264. Doi: 10.3390/biology14091264.

5.Paing JN, Galino MGM, Anongos SF. Exploring the connections between traditional ecological knowledge, ecosystem services, and agroecosystem-based livelihoods in the Cordillera Region, Northern Philippines. Trop Ecol. 2025. Doi:10.1007/s42965-025-00393-w.

6.Rexhepi B, Bajrami A. EthnoPedagogical module: A theoretical exploration of knowledge transmission in ethnobiological systems. Int. J. Environ. Eng. Educ. 2025; 7(1):1-12. Doi: 10.55151/ijeedu.v7i1.181.

7.Congretel M, Pinton F. Local knowledge, know-how and knowledge mobilised in a globalised world: a new approach of indigenous local ecological knowledge. People Nat. 2020; 2:527-543. Doi:10.1002/pan3.10142.

8.Kumar A, Kumar S, Komal, Ramchiary N, Singh P. Role of traditional ethnobotanical knowledge and indigenous communities in achieving sustainable development goals. Sustainability. 2021; 13:3062. Doi: 10.3390/su13063062.

9.Georgiadis P. Ethnobotanical knowledge against the combined biodiversity, poverty and climate crisis: A case study from a Karen community in Northern Thailand. Plants People Planet. 2022; 4(4):382-391. Doi: 10.1002/ppp3.10259.

10.Phulkerd S, Thapsuwan S, Soottipong Gray R, Chamratrithirong A. Characterizing urban home gardening and associated factors to shape fruit and vegetable consumption among non-farmers in Thailand. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17:5400. Doi:10.3390/ijerph17155400.

11.Siebenhütter S. Language practices and attitudes among young minority language speakers in Thailand. J Multiling Multicult Dev. 2020; 42:1-26. Doi:10.1080/01434632.2019.1711102.

12.Punchay K, Inta A, Tiansawat P, Balslev H, Wangpakapattanawong P. Traditional knowledge of wild food plants of Thai Karen and Lawa (Thailand). Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2020; 67. Doi:10.1007/s10722-020-00910-x.

13.Panyadee P, Balslev H, Wangpakapattanawong P, Inta A. Medicinal plants in homegardens of four ethnic groups in Thailand. J Ethnopharmacol. 2019; 239:111927. Doi:10.1016/j.jep.2019.111927.

14.Gebre A, Gitima G, Berhanu Y. Ethnobotanical study of wild edible plants in Goba District, Southwest Ethiopia. Sci. Rep. 2025; 15:27689. Doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-11862-6.

15.Pariyatvisuttikhun D, Jumnongruk I, Kaewla W. Value and influence of Buddhism to “Khmer-Lao Kui” way of lives in Moon River, Surin Province. PEOPLE: Int. J. Soc. Sci. 2017; 3(2):2384-2394. Doi: 10.20319/pijss.2017.32.23842394.

16.Prueksapong A, Watanabe T, Funakawa S. Profile description, properties, and classification of paddy soils at different topographical positions in Surin Province, Thailand (Pedon paper). Pedologist 2015; 59(2):63-73. Doi: 10.18920/pedologist.59.2_63.

17.Office of Provincial Commercial Affairs Surin. Available online: https://surin.moc.go.th/th/content/page/index/id/1055 (accessed on 22 March 2025)

18.Department of Provincial Administration (DOPA), Thailand. Population statistics. Available from: https://stat.bora.dopa.go.th/stat/statnew/statMenu/newStat/stat/ (accessed on 8 November 2025).

19.Tsuruta T, Chanachai S. A Preliminary Report on Diversity of Products in Organic Farmers' Markets in Surin, Northeast Thailand. Mem. Fac. Agr. Kinki Univ. 2016; 49:67-80.

20.Van der Haak, F. Calling the spirits: an observation of its practice among the Kui in Thailand. J. Siam Soc. 1987; 75:108-128.

21.Plants of the World Online, facilitated by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Available online: www.plantsoftheworldonline.org/ (accessed on 5 March 2025).

22.Goodman LA. Snowball sampling. In: Ann Math Stat. 1961; 32:148–170. Doi:10.1214/aoms/1177705148.

23.Tajik O, Golzar J, Noor S. Purposive sampling. Int J Educ Lang Stud. 2025; 1-9. Doi:10.22034/ijels.2025.490681.1029.

24.International Society of Ethnobiology (ISE). 2006. International Society of Ethnobiology Code of Ethics (with 2008 Additions). Available online: http://ethnobiology.net/code-of-ethics/ (accessed on 10 February 2025).

25.Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. 2011. Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from Their Utilisation to the Convention on Biological Diversity. United Nations, Montreal. Available online: https://www.cbd.int/abs/ (accessed on 10 February 2025).

26.Hoffman B, Gallaher T. Importance indices in ethnobotany. Ethnobot Res Appl. 2007; 5:201-218. Doi:10.1234/era.v5i0.130.

27.Heinrich M, Ankli A, Frei B, Weimann C, Sticher O. Medicinal plants in Mexico: healers' consensus and cultural importance. Soc Sci Med. 1998; 47:1859-1871. Doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00181-6.

28.Friedman J, Yaniv Z, Dafni A, Palewitch D. A preliminary classification of the healing potential of medicinal plants, based on a rational analysis of an ethnopharmacological field survey among Bedouins in the Negev Desert, Israel. J Ethnopharmacol. 1986; 16:275-286. Doi:10.1016/0378-8741(86)90094-2.

29.Thant Shin, Fujikawa K, Aung Zaw Moe, Uchiyama H. Traditional knowledge of wild edible plants with special emphasis on medicinal uses in Southern Shan State, Myanmar. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2018; 14: 48. Doi: 10.1186/s13002-018-0248-1

30.Wannakham S, Saensouk S, Saensouk P, Junsongduang A. Diversity and Ethnobotanical Study of Medicinal Plants in Thai Phuan Ethnic Group in Ban Phue District, Udon Thani Province, Thailand. Trop J Nat Prod Res. 2024; 8(10): 8716-8740. Doi: 10.26538/tjnpr/v8i10.15

31.Junsongduang A, Kasemwan W, Lumjoomjung S, Sabprachai W, Tanming W, Balslev H. Ethnomedicinal knowledge of traditional healers in Roi Et, Thailand. Plants. 2020; 9:1177. Doi:10.3390/plants9091177.

32.Dipu MA, Checco J, Williams L, Sultanbawa Y, Jones NA, Abdul Aziz A. Navigating challenges in native plant-based food value chains within the global food system: a systematic literature review. Agric Syst. 2025; 228:104373. Doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104373.

33.Galluzzi G, Cruz-Garcia GS, Togka KM, Visser B, Mbozi H. The role that local food plants can play in improving nutrition security and reducing seasonal scarcity in rural communities: a multi-country study. Sustainability. 2025; 17:4683. Doi:10.3390/su17104683.

34.Luo B, Tong Y, Liu Y, Zhang Y, Qin Y, Hu R. Ethnobotanical insights into the traditional food plants of the Baiku Yao community: A study of cultural significance, utilisation, and conservation. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2024; 20:52. Doi: 10.1186/s13002-024-00691-y.

35.Phatlamphu N, Saensouk P, Junsongduang A, Saensouk S. Ethnobotany of edible plants in Muang District, Kalasin Province, Thailand. Biodiversitas J Biol Divers. 2021; 22:5432-5444. Doi:10.13057/biodiv/d221225.

36.Niamngon P, Saensouk S, Saensouk P, Junsongduang A. Ethnobotanical knowledge of Isaan Laos tribe in Khong Chai District, Kalasin Province, Thailand with particular focus on medicinal uses. Biodiversitas. 2023; 24:6793-6824. Doi:10.13057/biodiv/d241242.

37.Pholhiamhan R, Saensouk S, Saensouk P. Ethnobotany of Phu Thai ethnic group in Nakhon Phanom Province, Thailand. Walailak J Sci Technol. 2017; 15(10):679-699. Doi:10.48048/wjst.2018.3737.

38.Ammar LA, Kurniawati B, Anggorowati D, Cahyaningsih AP, Setyawan AD. Ethnobotanical study of the medicinal plants used by local communities in karst area of Pacitan District, East Java, Indonesia. Int. J. Trop. Drylands 2021; 5(2):84-93. Doi: 10.13057/tropdrylands/t050205.

39.Teotia D, Agrawal A, Kumar V, Jain P, Kumar A, Agrawal B, Malik V. Ethnobotany, phytochemistry and biological activities of the genus Allium L. Environment Conserv J. 2025; 26(3):1058-1076. Doi:10.36953/ECJ.32103049.

40.Khairullah AR, Solikhah TI, Ansori ANM, Fadholly A, Ramandinianto SC, Ansharieta R, Widodo A, Riwu KHP, Putri N, Proboningrat A, Kusala MKJ, Rendragraha BW, Putra ARS, Anshori A. A review of an important medicinal plant: Alpinia galanga (L.) Willd. Sys Rev Pharm. 2020; 11(10):387-395.

41.Nazil ABH, Hamayun M, Khan A, Yaseem T, Bussmann RW, Murad W. Quantitative ethnobotanical appraisal of medicinal plants used by indigenous communities of District Malakand, Pakistan. Ethnobot. Res. Appl. 2022; 24:1-14.

42.Destryana RA, Estiasih T, Sukardi, Pranowo D. Zingiberaceae rhizome essential oil: a review of chemical composition, biological activity, and application in food industry. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2024; 1299:012010. Doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1299/1/012010.

43.Xue J, Yin Y. Plant-based food: From nutritional value to health benefits. Foods 2024; 13(22):3595. Doi: 10.3390/foods13223595.

44.Donno D, Mellano MG, Cerutti AK, Beccaro GL. Nutraceuticals in alternative and underutilised fruits as functional food ingredients: Ancient species for new health needs. In: Alternative and Replacement Foods. 2018:261-282. Doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-811446-9.00009-5.

45.Inta A, Trisonthi C, Pongamornkul W, Panyadee P. Ethnobotany of Zingiberaceae in Mae Hong Son, Northern Thailand. Biodiversitas. 2023; 24:2114-2124. Doi:10.13057/biodiv/d240422.

46.Ragsasilp A, Saensouk P, Pholhiamhan R, Saensouk S. Ethnobotany of Zingiberaceae for the Phu Thai ethnic group in Nakhon Phanom Province, Thailand. Eng Access. 2022; 8(2):172-178. Doi:10.14456/mijet.2022.22.

47.Alolga RN, Wang F, Zhang X, Li J, Tran L-SP, Yin X. Bioactive compounds from the Zingiberaceae family with known antioxidant activities for possible therapeutic uses. Antioxidants. 2022; 11:1281. Doi:10.3390/antiox11071281.

48.Dewi N, Pendet N, Apriani R, Megawati F, Udayani W, Sugijanto M, Agustini N, Javandira C. Ethnobotanical insights and quantitative evaluation of medicinal plant utilisation in traditional cosmetic practices: a community-centered study. Bali Med Wellness J. 2025; 2. Doi:10.71341/bmwj.v2i1.34.

49.Siti HN, Mohamed S, Kamisah Y. Potential therapeutic effects of Citrus hystrix DC and its bioactive compounds on metabolic disorders. Pharmaceuticals. 2022; 15(2):167. Doi: 10.3390/ph15020167.

50.Hou S, Ma D, Wu S, Hui Q, Hao Z. Morinda citrifolia L.: A comprehensive review on phytochemistry, pharmacological effects, and antioxidant potential. Antioxidants. 2025; 14(3):295. Doi: 10.3390/antiox14030295.

51.Sun X, Chen W, Dai W, Xin H, Rahmand K, Wang Y, Zhang J, Zhang S, Xu L, Han T. Piper sarmentosum Roxb.: A review on its botany, traditional uses, phytochemistry, and pharmacological activities. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2020; 263:112897. Doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2020.112897.

52.Inta A, Panyadee P, Suksathan R, Pongamornkul W, Punchay K, Disayathanoowat T, Chaisoung N, Phichonsatcha T, Maneenoon K, Yang L. Culinary and medicinal wonders of the wild: an ethnobotanical review of native herbs and spices in Thailand. Heliyon. 2025; 11(4):e42470. Doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42470.

53.Bekele M, Woldeyes F, Lulekal E, Bekele T, Demissew S. Ethnobotanical investigation of medicinal plants in Buska Mountain range, Hamar district, Southwestern Ethiopia. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2022; 18(1):60. Doi: 10.1186/s13002-022-00558-0.

54.Esakkimuthu S, Mutheeswaran S, Elankani P, Pandikumar P, Ignacimuthu S. Quantitative analysis of medicinal plants used to treat musculoskeletal ailments by non-institutionally trained Siddha practitioners of Virudhunagar District, Tamil Nadu, India. J. Ayurveda Integr. Med. 2021; 12(1):58-64. Doi: 10.1016/j.jaim.2018.11.005.