Residue Content of Sugarcane Ripener Active Ingredients and Its Effect on Ratoon’s Growth in North Sumatera

Authors

  • Arinta R. Puspitasari Departement of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Brawijaya 65145, East Java, Malang, Indonesia
  • Moch D. Maghfoer Departement of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Brawijaya 65145, East Java, Malang, Indonesia
  • Setyono Y. Tyasmoro Departement of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Brawijaya 65145, East Java, Malang, Indonesia
  • Eko Widaryanto Departement of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Brawijaya 65145, East Java, Malang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26538/tjnpr/v8i2.33

Keywords:

glyphosate, ratoon, residue, maturity, Sugarcane

Abstract

The degree of sugarcane ripening is a vital parameter determined by measuring sucrose accumulation in sugarcane stalks. The constraints related to the degree of maturity that affect the quality of sugarcane in milled raw materials can be improved by applying sugarcane ripeners (SRs). However, some SRs are made from herbicides that could affect the subsequent ratoons. This study aimed to determine the effects of SRs on ratoon growth in sugarcane. The study was conducted in several plantations in North Sumatera. SRs were applied in December 2022, and the ratoons were observed in May 2023. The study used a split-split plot design with 3 treatment factors: variety (PS 881 and BZ 134), SRs application method (by drone and manual), SRs active ingredients (glyphosate, glyphosate plus Boron, and no spraying/control). The parameters observed were the number of shoots per row, the increase in gap, and the glyphosate residue in the subsequent ratoons. The results indicated a significant interaction between the application method, SRs’ active ingredients and the varieties and effects of SRs on the number of shoots per row. For PS 881, the drone and glyphosate application method showed the lowest number of shoots per row. The increase in the gap and fewer shoots per row was more common with drone spraying than manual spraying. Application of SRs using drones resulted in the highest residue in PS 881 compared to the other treatments.

Author Biography

Arinta R. Puspitasari, Departement of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Brawijaya 65145, East Java, Malang, Indonesia

Indonesian Sugar Research Institute, Pasuruan 67126, East Java, Indonesia

References

Toharisman A. A brief information about ZPK. [online] 2009 [cited 7 June 2010]. Available from:http://www.sugarresearch.org

Cardozo NP, and Sentelhas PC. Climatic effects on sugarcane ripening under the influence of cultivars and crop age. Sci Agric. 2013. 70(6): 449–456.

Spaunhorst DJ, Todd JR, Hale AL. Sugarcane cultivar response to glyphosate and tranexamic-ethyl ripeners in Louisiana. PLoS ONE, 2019; 14(6):1–11.

Ayele N, Tana T, Van Heerden PDR, W/Tsadik K, Alemayehu Y. Ripening response of sugarcane varieties to chemical ripeners and economic benefits during the early period of harvesting at Wonji-Shoa and Metahara Sugarcane Plantations, Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia. Int J of Agron. 2021: 1-9.

Su LY, Cruz AD, Moore PH, Maretzki A. The Relationship of Glyphosate Treatment to Sugar Metabolism in Sugarcane: New Physiological Insights. J of Plant Physiol. 1992; 140(2): 168–173.

Lawrie ID, Vlitos AJ. Chemical weed control in sugarcane. A review of recent studies in Trinidad. Proc 12th Congress Int Soc Sugar Cane Technol, Puerto Rico. 1965; 501–509.

Zulet-González A, Barco-Antoñanzas M, Gil-Monreal M, Royuela M, Zabalza A. Increased glyphosate-induced gene expression in the shikimate pathway is abolished in the presence of aromatic amino acids and mimicked by shikimate. Frontiers in Plant Sci. 2020;11: 1–11.

Maeda H, Dudareva, N. The shikimate pathway and aromatic amino acid biosynthesis in plants. Ann. Review of Plant Biol. 2012; (63): 73-105.

Viator RP, Dalley CB, Richard EP Jr. Late-season glyphosate ripener application coupled with post-harvest residue retention impacts subsequent ratoon yields. Int Sugar J. 2011;113(1349):374-380.

Dissanayake N, Hoy JW, Griffin JL. Herbicide effects on sugarcane growth, pythium root rot and pythium arrhenomanes. The Amer Phytopathol Soc. 1998; 6(88): 530-535.

De Silva MA, Caputo MM. Ripening and the use of ripeners for better sugarcane management. Intech crop management cases and tools for higher yield and sustainability. 2012:1-24

van Heerden PDR, Eggleston E, Donaldson RA. Ripening and post-harvest deterioration, in Sugarcane Physiology, Biochemistry, and Functional Biology. Edited by Botha FC and Moore PH. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Iowa, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1st edition. 2014: 55-84

Karmollachaab A, Bakhshandeh A, Telavat MRM, Moradi F, Shomeili, M. Sugarcane yield and technological ripening responses to chemical ripeners. Sugar Tech. 2016;18(3):285–291.

Junior, MRB, Moreira BRA, Filho ALB, Tedesco D, Shiratsuchi LS, Silva RP. UAVs to monitor and manage sugarcane: Integrative review. Agronomy. 2022;12(661):1-19.

De Silva, MA, Veliz JGE, Sartori MMP, Santos HL. Glyphosate applied at a hormetic dose improves ripening without impairing sugarcane productivity and ratoon sprouting. Sci of the Total Environ. 2022; 150503:1-9

Vasantha S, Shekinah DE, Gupta C, Rakkiyappan P. Tiller production, regulation and senescence di sugarcane (Saccharum species hybrid) genotypes. Sugar Tech. 2012; 14(2):156-160.

Bhale VMG. Effect of growth regulators and cultural treatment on productivity of ratoon cane. Indian Sugar. 1994; 44(8): 645-651.

Xu F, Wang Z, Lu G, Zeng R, Que Y. Sugarcane ratooning ability: research status, shortcomings, and prospects. Biol., 2021; 10:1-13.

Gomathi R, Rao PNG, Rakkiyappan P, Sundara BP, Shiyamala S. Physiological studies on ratoonability of sugarcane varieties under tropical Indian condition. Amer J of Plant Sci. 2013; 4: 274-281

Hunsigi G. Ratooning in sugarcane. Outlook on Agriculture. 1989; 18(4):175-184.

Matsuoka S, Stolf R. Sugarcane tillering and ratooning: a key factor for profitable cropping. Sugarcane: production, cultivation and uses. Nova Science Publishers, Inc. 2012.

Dalley CD, Richard EP. Herbicides as ripeners for sugarcane. Weed Sci. 2010; 58(3):329–333.

Didier KK, Crepin PB, Carine NA, Melanie BB, Yah O, Michel Z. Effect of glyphosate used as a sugarcane chemical ripener in Cote d’Ivoire. Africa J of Plant Sci. 2017;11(8): 341-350

Helander M, Pauna A, Saikkonen K, Saloniemi I. Glyphosate residues in soil affect crop plant germination and growth. Sci Reports. 2019; 9:19653: 1-9.

Donaldson RA. Sugar cane ripening in South Africa of the past decade. Proc of the Int Soc of Sugar Cane Technol. 1999; 23:22–26.

Morgan T, Jackson P, McDonald L, Holtum J. Chemical ripeners increase early season sugar content in a range of sugarcane varieties. Aust J of Agric Res. 2007; 58(3):233–241.

Vasantha S, Kumar RA, Tayade AS, Krishnapriya V, Ramand B, Solomon S. Physiology of sucrose productivity and implications of ripeners in sugarcane. Sugar Tech. 2022; 24(3): 715–731.

Clowes MSJ. Early and late season chemical ripening of sugarcane. Proc of South Africa Sugar Technol Assn. 1978; June: 160–165.

Eker S, Ozturk L, Yazici A, Erenoglu B, Romheld V, Cakmak I. Foliar-applied glyphosate substantially reduced uptake and transport of iron and manganese in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) plants. J of Agric and Food Chem. 2006; 54 (26): 10019-10025.

Cakmak I, Yazici A, Tutus Y, Ozturk L. Glyphosate reduced seed and leaf concentrations of calcium, manganese, magnesium, and iron in non-glyphosate resistant soybean. European J of Agron. 2009; 3 (31): 114-119.

Tesfamariam T, Bott S, Cakmak I, Romheld V, Neumann G. Glyphosate in the rhizosphere-role of waiting times and different glyphosate binding forms in soils for phytotoxicity to non-target plants. European J of Agron. 2009; (31): 126-132.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-02

How to Cite

Puspitasari, A. R., Maghfoer, M. D., Tyasmoro, S. Y., & Widaryanto, E. (2024). Residue Content of Sugarcane Ripener Active Ingredients and Its Effect on Ratoon’s Growth in North Sumatera. Tropical Journal of Natural Product Research (TJNPR), 8(2), 6418–6422. https://doi.org/10.26538/tjnpr/v8i2.33